So do you think she's a victim or a actress.
It's been very interesting to observe how many have either party guilty or innocent based on what's been reported or opined in the media. And if what has been reported about the trial is accurate, from what I've read neither seem to be particularly credible witnesses under the circumstances.
I am even worse! I have not followed this at all as i do not listen to the news.
Haha, so you're confident the saying don't judge a book by its cover has no place in this instance?
Are you taking the piss? So in the absence of evidence or fact we can substitute our own story to fit the agenda to send someone to gaol. Two people know what happened. Her case wont proceed but he will always be associated with a alleged rape and she will forever be a victim regardless of the crucial fact that he pleaded not guilty and was never convicted.
The facts are very few thats why a jury was unable to reach a verdict. Other than agreeing they had drinks with a group afterwork then sharing a ride to Parliament house the remainder has no agreed facts. He told several versions of why he was there , possibly also to attempt to retain his job....only he knows.
I said from the get go when the jury was dismissed that whoever it was that broke the rules likely did it deliberately to get them all out of it as it was going nowhere.
