Lisa Wilkinson needs to shut her mouth about a matter before court. She’s one of the only proper qualified journalists on that shit show the project so should know better. Her employer ought to reign her in
Irrespective of the circumstances or who is involved, it still has to go through a proper legal process to find innocence or guilt. Something that is much harder to achieve these days for anything that is in the media beforehand and especially in this case when people like Wilkinson (and others) feel the need to shoot their mouth off on a public platform to try and make us feel a certain way. (For the record I didn't actually see Wilkinson but I can guess pretty easily).
As are millions of people throughout history if that's the case.
The law does not explicitly state how sober a person needs to be in order to make an informed decision. It is up to a judge to decide if a complainant was too drunk to consent. A person could be intoxicated but yet a judge could determine that he or she still had the coherent capacity to consent, for example, by saying ‘yes’ to the sexual activity.
No, but if it was applied retrospectively.