Online: B0nes

Solar panels

12/15
  • obisteve
    obisteve
    1 month
    Best thing either party could do for the AEMO grid in the short term would be to push the east coast gas exporters to reserve sufficient supply for the domestic market. Sure, they need to fulfil their long term export contracts, but currently they're exporting way over those and selling it on the international spot market, which means the Oz gas fired generators are paying those prices too. The exporters are running a massive campaign at the moment to be able to expand exploration and extraction, but available supply isn't the problem, if that's expanded without an Oz reserved amount, the new surplus will go overseas too. I can't believe the Qld govt stuffed this up when it was set up, the WA govt had enough common sense to avoid this mistake. 
    I'm not opposed to nuclear power really, and I like the proposed idea that they're to be nationally owned and operated, but it won't be cheap or soon.
    And a bit of a problem, anyone up to storing some drums of spent fuel rods in their back yard? Any takers?
    If the fkn nimbys got upset about new power lines, how do you think they'll go with a nuclear waste dump?

    Late edit. Looks like both sides of politics will announce a domestic gas reservation policy tomorrow, but probably only on new developments.
    And I was out of date, Qld introduced its own on new developments in 2017. I think it's only on some small generators out near the gas fields so no real effect on wholesale price bidding. Will look into it a bit more.
  • Hilly
    Hilly
    1 month
    Fuel rods are an issue but that aside the current crop of reactors are just not the right fit, both cost, $600 billion or more and time to start up, varies but let's say 10 years, we need it quicker, if power lines are needed then power lines there should be, Greenies be damned.
    Other countries are investing in research to miniaturise and speed up reactor building times, we were invited to join but declined, I know the government has committed to its renewables path but keeping abreast of and even hastening clean-ish alternatives can't be a bad thing surely! 
    And the gas! Corporations have devious means to get things in their favour, the threat of them pulling out caves a lot of pollies resolve, got to get a pair and do what's right for us, there will be other investors. 
    Queensland coal royalties are a good example, miners bleated like mad and flung millions into advertising campaigns to get it squashed claiming calamity would ensure, but, they are still digging coal, the campaign was in fact disinformation, not misinformation, never let the truth come before maximum profits.
  • dicko
    dicko
    1 month
    Ah, I dunno , My head hurts, back to the traditional steam turbine as found in your standard powerhouse , you can make the steam with whatever , coal, gas , nuclear, left over crops {used as dry fuel, distilled for ethanol/alcohol, pressed for oil} wood , most can be made to burn clean. "so called renewables ""is a dream, Too expensive. The real renewables are growing near you right now. easy simple, the technology is here right now ,  and completely non scary.!
  • Hilly
    Hilly
    1 month
    Thing that niggles me about the renewables being called too expensive is this, any power station that relies on burning something needs fuel, so what's the cost involved in getting that fuel into the station? Be it coal, gas, oil, timber or whatever, what's the cost comparison over say 25 years per kw made, to be fair include the cost of building the power station, no one lays this out that I can see, I don't know the answer to that but I would sure like to but given the vested interests in the competing industries getting truthful figures from either would be near impossible I imagine.
    If we knew this then we could make an informed choice instead of just picking a team.
  • Hilly
    Hilly
    1 month
    This article is leaning into renewables, American but relevant, so much disinformation is spread around by people that becomes misinformation because they are repeating a lie that they don't know is a lie, the fossil fuel industry is ruthless in protecting its investments, never let the truth get in the way of profits, thing is though, electricity prices will probably not come down no matter how it's generated. Why is that? Who is profiting off these prices? Or is it the transmission infrastructure is so expensive to maintain/build that it is what it is?

  • dicko
    dicko
    1 month
    I suspect the naysayers to burning trash have vested interests???
  • Hilly
    Hilly
    1 month
    Quoting dicko on 27 Mar 2025 12:49 AM

    I suspect the naysayers to burning trash have vested interests???

    That was my point, they all have vested interests, like Steve said before, I'll listen to what the CSRIO has to say with a bit more confidence than some talking head on tv.
  • Hilly
    Hilly
    1 month
    Quoting dicko on 27 Mar 2025 03:27 AMedited: 27 Mar 2025 03:29 AM

    Back to reliable cheap dependable coal for me. no more "renewables"" and ""climate change" dogma rubbish used to justify wrecking the countries economy.

    I'm 60 next birthday and I'm still learning stuff, some of those things negate stuff that I believed were true previously, I'm happy to be wrong about things if they are proven false.
  • obisteve
    obisteve
    1 month
    Lot of data there for light reading dicko, want to give a hint about where you are taking it so I can study it in an informed manner?
    In a related matter, I visited a small scale sawmill operation about 25 years ago, 3 old blokes working with a traditional reciprocating steam engine, flat belt driving the saws, running on all offcuts. They even had an old lighting plant generator hooked up to give them lights and a small amount of power if needed. They reckoned total costs were 1 match a day, probably bullshit, they would have gone through a fair bit of grease on the shaft pillow blocks. It was a.nice operation. I'd be happy to see it running for the next 500 years.
  • dicko
    dicko
    1 month
    I guess I think our governments needed to have the political guts to keep the coal/gas burning stations upgraded and running from 20 years ago. no guts!! just bowed to the climate change activists and no gas/coal cranks,  to get legislation through. The rush is what has caused the problem. all the money has been spent on so called "renewables" and now we have a problem. Sooooo! who to vote for??? get rid of compulsory preferential voting maybe?? I dunno. I am going to draw a new box on my voting form with DICKO next to it , and vote for myself .
  • obisteve
    obisteve
    1 month
    But mate, 20 years ago state governments didn't own most of the countries powerstations.
    They'd sold them off to private operators.
    Starting in the 80s in SA, then NS W. Even QLD sold a few by the late 90s, but kept 7.
    You've posted a link to a list of all generators, their owners are listed there, check online who these owners are, it's interesting reading.
    It was a sale made mostly for ideological reasons, it was the Reagan-Thatcher years and privatisation was all the go. It was claimed that private enterprise would run them better than governments, how well has that turned out?
    These owners have run them since, making a reasonable profit, and mostly sending it offshore, but not investing enough in repairs and preventative maintenance to keep them reliable as they age, and never budgetting to replace them. When the generators were sold, a market was set up to coordinate the supply, initially with generators bidding for 1/2 hour blocks of supply, but now for 5 minute blocks. This set up the situation that's made things worse now. As solar panels started appearing on roofs in ever increasing numbers, the power they supply became cheaper. It's now the cheapest power that can be supplied to the grid on sunny days between 10am and 2pm. Because the grid is run by a market, this cheap power under cuts the coal fired generators in that time period on sunny days, so they throttle back the generators to avoid losing money, which puts more thermal shock on the boilers, which increases their maintenance costs and downgrades their reliability and service life.
    Never doubt it, the privately owned generators will shut down when the plant reaches an unprofitable point in its service life, which is why one of them is now screaming for the NSW govt to subsidise their operations to keep an essential service going for a few more years.
    Reward them for their short sighted business practises and excessive profit taking in other words.
    You don't need to conjure up rabid greenies to see why the power grid is facing problems. To me it mostly shows the foolishness of privatising the supply of an essential service and trying then to run it as a spot market controlled system.
    But maybe I'm just an old Bolshy.
    I do like your idea of voting for yourself.
    Any boiler techs on the forum want to comment on what I've said?
  • Hilly
    Hilly
    1 month
    A company to read up on in the battery world if that technology interests you at all is the Altilium Group, while the screeching about poisons and the environment clamber for the industries demise they are making huge progress in reclamation.
    Wind generation will benefit with new tech being applied in the manufacturing of the blades using recyclable materials that are stronger than what has been in use, whether or not this helps in the long run remains to be seen but the boffins are hard at work. 


12/15