Not sure why you’d use a premium, unique & first-to-market offering as a loss leader.
I see your point.
Maybe its the circles I move in.. but all the 20 something dudes I know are thrashing about on ironheads and shovels, chopped and flaked, rusty and beaten to fck, theyre dressed in dirty denim, long hair, beards, moustaches and tattoos, rock n roll and beer. Generally they want it super custom and something they can wrench on.
Premium price i agree, guess they are trying to recoup some R&D investment perhaps
Yea I thought the new FXDR or whatever the fuck it's called would be around the price of a Breakout , but fuck me it's way dearer ! Why not just bring back a FXWG if there's another bike with raked forks?
When the Zero was introduced in Australia (2010) the price was $12,990 +ORC.
Not a bad looking bike, either - and not a world away from the LiveWire, although the LiveWire seems to be of much higher quality and bigger too.
Still, it is not $20,000.00 worth of more quality and further to that, Harley have a mountain of other bikes with which to absorb R&D costs whereas for Zero, this was it. One bike, and they still managed to design, build, ship and put it on the road for what will be a third of the price of a LiveWire.
I’d hoped the FXDR would be performance oriented but with a 240 rear and 120 front, guess it isn’t. I don’t reckon the different swing arm would overcome the inherent poor handling of that tyre combo either. May as well get a Breakout, cheaper and you get a free pillion seat :)
So what you might be saying is it"could" be cheaper than what I'm thinking ?
I’m saying that if Harley wanted to, it could easily absorb the R&D costs of the LiveWire via other models and put it up for sale in Australia for around $18,000 + ORC.
Can i ask how you came up with that number as HD has not released the price for the livewire yet?