We’re talking about a pot hole…..
The roads are too big to hold the authorities accountable for every pothole out there (non-feasance)
You deleted your first reply and then posted this. Which one am i supposed to reply to?
I know looks are in the eye of the beholder. Not sure what drugs they were on but in my eyes it looks ugly as hell. I might buy it if they dropped a couple of zero's off the purchase price. I would then fit some nice spoke wheels and then try to make the engine look good by painting some parts black and polishing other parts.
Gentleman hopefully you merely looked at the photos and didn't digest what the bike actually is.....a Prototype. This is only 1 of 2 ever made and cant EVER be replaced. Lastly have a look at the claimed Hp and Tq for a 1994 Hd compared to this bike....in fact look a little later model...
If I had the funds for a Phase 4 Falcon and I could get my mits on it there would be no way in hell I would butcher it, some vehicles need to stay as the factory intended. My pet hate is seeing an older car tastefully modified but then ruined by adding modern oversized rims. Sorry but that bike is screaming out for a set of spoked rims. Would keep all the parts so it could be put back to stock if I was to sell it.
I wouldn’t compare that ugly prototype motorcycle that some manufacturer tried to unsuccessfully claim was going to be a new Indian to a phase iv gto falcon. Like comparing Swiss chocolate to diarrhoea
I was relying on people to look beyond the analogy. Prototypes are normally a fairly ugly proposition at the best of times.
Absolutely FB.....beautiful old girl. As for the description of "Prototype" i would be more inclined to describe those early bike as "Pre Production" bearing in mind that they started selling them in that form very soon after that unveiling. I believe that there is a blue one for sale in Australia some time back.
Just finishing off restoring a 1966
Had a quick ride thru the mountains today
