Can anyone find a more useless part than this...
http://www.emd-part-usa.com/twin-cam/57-snatch-primary-cover.html
Art over function? You're too kind. Having purchased an EMD Ribbed Primary Cover for a 2007 up Twin Cam, I can say the following: Fit: Okay, that's if you accept a grinding wheel finish on some of the gasket surfaces. One of the screw holes was elongated to match stock inner primary. Core shift again. One other hole not drilled properly. The clutch adjuster centre cap was useless, with core shift being the problem of the casting. The hex cast into the centre cap did not fit any known size, Metric or Imperial. Function: Less than capable if you own a 2012+ model, or any engine with a SE Compensator. Lacks the oiling well cast into the stock 2013+ primary cover. Customer Service: Lacking. Personal contact with France had nobody (admitting to) speaking English or answering emails. US distributor less than knowledgable about HD product. Submitted photos and detailed explanation, ignored. Not a cheap cover @ $900. After my experience, caveat emptor.
In regards to the Victory gone down the sink topic by Revzilla. This is one of the things they really attacked in their Worst shit of 2016 coverage.
http://houseofharley.com/ride-bells.html Here ya go, a more useless part.
The Aussie myth and slang saying not so useful.
Actually i think i could do the world a favour and make some beer money at the same time;
http://www.hdforums.com.au/Default.aspx?tabid=71&forumid=10&postid=666651&view=topic
I think Paulys entry, the primary cover, takes the cake here
spec when you add in an ugly factor score of 274 out of 10.
Will just say i believe in rd gremlins, but don't have a bell,
I figure any gremlin mentally ill enough t jump on my bike
would already be locked up.