Finally an news article/discussion showing some common sense,and really puts things back in perspective and shows up cambell newman for the pencil dick he really is. http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2013/s3869695.htm
copied from the legal doccument..... 4 Definitions In this Act— association means any of the following— (a) a corporation; (b) an unincorporated association; (c) a club or league; (d) any other group of 3 or more persons by whatever name called, whether associated formally or informally and whether the group is legal or illegal. SO...and excuse me if im wrong, (i am not a legal expert) does this mean 3 people traveling to work on the same train, in a car, or bus quallify????? why single out riders in particular? there is no mention of motorcycles at all. I am a law abiding citizen by choice. I go to work, and pay my taxes. but by my understanding, i am less criminal than people in busses as long as no two others ride near me on their bikes. motorcycles do not commit crime. No motorcycle has ever been arrested for a crime, and no brand of motorcycle is more likely to commit a crime. Yet licensed riders of motorcycles are going to be getting all the attention. there could be all sorts of products you could statistically prove are more likely to be associated with crime. for example (at a guess) white ox tobacco, VN commodpres, any alcohol products, etc etc. why not be busting any 3 people in a bottle store.... riding a harley with 2 friends is not a crime. the real crime is the authorities elected by the people to represent them chosing without consultation to make laws that remove law abiding citizens basic human rights...