How's this, a bit rich?
Go into dealer to have a look around, get a price on my trade-in, which they don't want as it's not one of their type/brand of bikes. So they ring around and get a price, which they send me by email. I go back a couple of weeks later (after trying to sell my bike privately), see something I like, but hesitant to sign on the dotted line. Staff in full press mode, "what can we do to make you sign today" etc. Long story short, I end up signing, get bike a few days later, get an invoice a few more days later, I owe them $500 dollars more than the original deal because they got 500 bucks less for the trade-in.
I think that's a bit rich.
yeah I mentioned it on my feedback, will see if I Get a reaction
What they got for the bike after they took possession of it is their problem, what was written on the yellow agreement between you and them stands.
Don't pay the invoice, take it to consumer affairs and I think they'll convince the dealer that they may have made a weeny error,,,,,
Tell em nothing. If they "contact" again, tell em to FUCK OFF ! Do your first " free" service yourself so they don't get a hold of your bike again. They are " cunted " ( technical term ) and so be it... In 1997 I looked at a new FXSTC Softail Custom in a dealer's showroom here in Perth . Bike has flat bars. a single seat etc etc in the showroom , with the "extras" added to the retail price of a " normal" bike . On the day of my pickup , I ask for all the stock parts to go in the boot of my missus' Ford Festiva " Oh they say . that price was " exchange " , ie full retail PLUS the cost of the parts !!
( They would have sold the new bike take-off parts under the counter for hundreds of dollars or put them on tired showroom used bikes ) I say , well fuck me then , get all my STOCK OEM parts back on the bike and REDUCE the price by the extras cost !! Within 10 minutes my wife's Festiva has a boot full of stock OEM 1997 Softail parts including a two up seat.
( You don't argue with a handy irate Scotsman mate !) STAND UP FOR YOURSELF OR BE FUCKED FOR SURE MATE
Err,,,, first service Free ?
When did this start happening ?
To paulybronco "Sorry that is the biggest piece of crap advise i have ever heard !!" The way this was first portrayed , ( we know the scene has just now changed ) then my advice was 100% technically correct. Always sounded a wee bit " strange " but you get that from time to time.
If "an invoice" had been raised then there is a debt outstanding ( right or wrong !) and retention of a vehicle is always an option. Would a dealer have " done it " ? That's the 64,000 dollar question. A CAR dealer and or workshop would do it in a heartbeat
If there was/is a " genuine arithmetic error" on the dealer's part then they could and would use the posession of the vehicle as a resolution tool.
Having spent 15+ years in the car game ," some of the buyers are liars and some of the liars are buyers " quote/unquote. And some of the dealers too FFsake !
No disrespect intended to the original poster by the way
So the dealer is not a stealer...Good headline for two pages...
BT