Gday was reading on net about octane boosters ect.Anyways got thinking about throwing some in me bike( 2012 dyna with a stage 4 kit)just for a bit extra get up and go.
Nulon pro strenth raised ron up 2.8, meaning 100.8 ron using bp ultimate or other premium 98 fuel.So before I go ahead just wanted a little advice if wise to do so or not,dont want to fuck me motor just yet.
Cheers 68 Wideglide.
I tune for the fuel I use the most, BP98 Ultimate.
Don't think there is much to gain by souping up 98,,, waisting dollars.
I have noticed that the Ultra doesn't like some fills from Caltex or Shell, I put this down to the servo operators choice of what they actually put in the tanks.
I do keep a bottle or two of the Pro-Strength octane booster handy for times that I can only refuel with 91 octane, or the engine tells me it's being fed low octane, hoping that it raises it to around where the engine is tuned for. The booster Seems to work OK in those cases.
Nulon Pro-Strength claims to boost octane by 7 numbers.
Just to follow up here widey, and try to answer your original question, I think you'de be pretty safe in giving it a try and see if you notice any difference the booster would make.
As I hinted before, you would notice a bigger change if adding the booster to 91 ron, but as Steve mentioned it probabley isn't wise or of much benefit to add a booster to 98 ron as it most likeley already contains the max legal/safe amount of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl,
the same ingredient that makes up about 6.5% of the Nulon Pro Booster.
You will see on the packaging that it recommends to advance the spark timming to acheive full power potential. Of course, you change the octane rating then you gotta change the tune to suit.
As the other boyz say, you can run 91 ron in high performance / high compression engines with no issues, which is correct, but at a loss of potential power because the engine has to be de-tuned (ignition timming retarded) to accommodate the lower fuel rating.
(reminds me of the old holden red moter days when ya lifted the bonnet and advanced the timming 3 degrees for super and retarded it 3 degrees for standard)
Carbon build up can also be attributed to poor combustion chamber design, or more so, incomplete burning / combustion, due to poor tuning, running rich.
As the Pro Octane Booster is 6.5% methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl, and 93.5% liquid hydrocarbons, a properly tuned engine that is running efficiently will not suffer a build up from the additive.
As you're running a stage 4 kit and say that you're looking for just a bit extra get up and go I doubt you're thinking of the later, so here's my take on what you need to do,
Try the Octane booster, but to be fair, you must retune for any potential increase and efficientcy, then if you do experience a gain in get up and go, continue to add the booster to maintain the fuel rating for that tune.
If you don't experience any noticable gain in power or effeciency, quit the booster and re-tune for what ever fuel you decide to use as the norm.
My guess and reccommenation would be 98 ron to acheive the max potential from the donk.
It'll be interesting to see what gains you get in a stage 4 engine by being able to kick the tune a wee bit.
If I've been able to explain all that correctly, you'll now know that I think the biggest advantage with Pro Octane Booster is to add it when ya get caught having to use 91 ron fuel when ya machine is tuned for 98. I reckon the gains in adding it to 98 ron fuel will be negligable.
And of course, the other thought is if you want a bit extra in get up and go, the garunteed way is to add on a little NOS bottle,
Thanks guys for all the feedback seems most of you give it a thumbs down so will abort that idea for now.
As for the gas,could be just the ticket keep ya's posted.
Merry xmas all.
68 wideglide.
And our octane numbers (RON) mean little to our USA buddies, who use a different rating system.
wikicars.org/en/Octane_rating
If octane booster makes you happy, go for it, but not really worth it.
Rocket, Sounds like a nice strong 103.
I remember asking Mark about Dan Vance, and he gave hime a good rap.
Here's a link to United :
www.unitedpetroleum.com.au/united/fuel/premium-100
I wouldn't be too concerned with running 10% Ethanol, after all, HD's come from the US where Ethanol is common.
greeting rocket...
small world.... it was a great send off for an awesome guy
I cannot confirm it contained ethanol... all I know is that the signs on the pump just didnt look right. The link posted now confirms my suspicions. After I filled with United 100 and was down to 1/4 tank I started having all sorts of issues with lack of power when I twisted the throttle. It was a bitch to start and if I wrapped the throttle the bike instantly died. A slow rotation was the only way I could get home. Filled with BP98 (I usually use 95) and no more issues. I'm told that mixing fuels also leaves a residue on the filter so it could have been that. Anyway never had any more problems. Mine is a 2007 (build 10/06) so not sure rubber would be ethanol resistant.
Hope we can catch up again....