For what it’s worth to anyone I thought I’d write a comparison of my new 2012 Road King and my previous bike a 2009 Kawasaki VN1700 Vulcan Classic.
Both bikes have pros and cons.
For the Road King the ride is stiffer but the upside is that it handles so much better. It is very noticeable in low speeds and the bike seems to feel lighter even though both bikes are roughly the same weight. Cornering on the Road King seems much easier and it just wants to lean whereas the Kawasaki seemed heavier in corners.
Both bikes have adjustable rear shocks but the Kawasaki has twin air-assisted shocks, with 3-way rebound damping so you could literally dial in the adjustment when you went two up.
The Kawasaki was known to my biker mates as the “stump pull” because it had so much torque whereas the Road King has stacks of horsepower and jumps when your twist the throttle. Which is pretty cool.
The Kawasaki floorboards were lower so it was a bit more comfortable but I soon got use to the Road King’s floorboard position. The Kawasaki instrumentation is better laid out, you can see the trip meter, clock and gear indicator, whereas the Road King is limited to one. Which is fine as it adds to the old school look of the Road King. And lets face it the looks of a bike are just as important as the handling.
So in a nutshell the Road King handles better, looks way cooler, and I can detach the windscreen in the hot weather. Plus it’s a Harley J
Thanks Scotti, you're right you definitely get more bang for your buck. The 103 has plenty of power and pushes the bike along nicely. I'm loving it Can't keep the smile off my face