If the Hyundai Motor Car Company can give a 10 year Warranty on the drive train, Yes I know it's a Car and yes I know that there not the most reliable car to use as an example.
Why can't Motorcycle Companies give a better Warranty than 2 years?
Is it because they know their products won't last more than a couple of years, any ideas anyone?
Good question allde. I know that Victory in the USA had a 5 year warranty going at one stage. Cannot for the life of me understand why we can't get AT LEAST a 3 year warranty as standard on most all bikes. Maybe we're just too damn small a market for the manufacturers to be bothered!
Not me cooky, I'm not a twin cam man, I'm a Revolution Man, no problems with those motors made to last. That's because the VRods don't have the problems that the aircooled motors have. The V is liquid cooled. It produces almost twice the horsepower numbers of an aircooled VTwin. The V Rod has a Porsche/Harley Davidson motor built as some kind of collaboration between the two companies. Lots of Vrods in the 160 km's plus range with out any issues plus their have been a few in the mid 200 km's So what were you saying about a piece of Junk.
Another + 1 for Mitsubishi . Bought a Pajero to tow a 2500kg caravan . 10 yr 160k warranty pulling the van around Aust .
Does it really matter if evo's are more rebuildable than twinkies? After all even the early 88's are good for 80,000kms plus. For most people that's 8 to 10 years riding and the number of people I know who've kept a single bike for more kms than that would be less than 10%.