HD Forums Australia
Home
Online: baldy1450
Topics

'69 FLH rego bits

  • philthy
    philthy
    14 years ago

    To rego my 69 FLH, could I do it minus blinkers,mirrors,horn, front guard, etc etc coz its pre 1970 or 71, or 72 whatever? Compliancing laws I think it's called?   I'd like to rego her with the most minimal bits needed. If that makes sense. Plus there's no such thing in Qld anymore as single seat rego. My softy is regoed as a single seater which I dun yrs ago, but not allowed anymore! A FXCW ,solo seat stock, is the same rego $'s as an FXCW/C which is a dual seat. That really sucks. Any help appreciated.    

  • Sparra
    Sparra
    14 years ago

    I thought it used to be pre 79=no blinkers....but could be wrong...

  • houli
    houli
    14 years ago

    Why don`t you ask them, it would save you a whole lot of grief getting the facts instead of the BS. I would bet you need a horn, front and rear guard, head and tail light and brake light, front and rear brake, engine number, 69 never had a frame number, chain guard and all the common sense items, if it looks clean and roadworthy you should be ok, if it looks like shit your only wasting your time.   

  • houli
    houli
    14 years ago

    I registered my 70 FLH in Vic with no blinkers, one mirror r/h side, one brake light switch rear brake, stock exhaust, thats pretty much the difference in Vic between new and old bikes,

  • V2Evo96
    V2Evo96
    14 years ago
    I think Chopaweeza might assist if he sees this.
  • houli
    houli
    14 years ago
     
    Its a bit of a read but has most things covered................................."The facts not the fiction"
     
    Queensland Transport introduced the safety certificate in November 1999 to replace the old roadworthy certificate or RWC, and it became mandatory to obtain and display a current safety certificate on any registered motorcycle from the moment it's offered for sale.

    The only times it's not required to display current safety certificate on a motorcycle for sale is when the motorcycle's either unregistered or is traded to or between licensed motor dealers.

    Queensland Transport safety certificates can only be issued by Approved Inspection Stations (AIS), being service stations, garages or workshops approved by Queensland Transport to conduct inspections.

    For private motorcycle sellers, Queensland Transport safety certificates must be issued in the two months or 2000 kilometres prior to sale, whichever comes first.

    You are required to display a safety certificate in a conspicuous place and for motorcycles it's either on the forks or front guard.

    Failure to display a Queensland Transport safety certificate on the motorcycle from the time it's first offered for sale can carry an on-the-spot fine penalty of $375.

    Information on this website relating to motorcycle inspection is drawn from the Queensland Transport Code of Practice for Approved Inspection Stations (AIS) and Approved Persons; guidelines followed during safety certificate inspections and vehicle modification certification.

    Following the code of practice guidelines below and rectifying faults you uncover should assure your motorcycle will pass on first inspection, avoiding any inconvenient and possible costly re-inspection.



     

    SEATING INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Seating for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    SEATING

    Objective:     To ensure that all seating fitted to the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), provide a comfortable and secure position for the driver to control the motorcycle and control the deceleration of all motorcycle occupants.


    SEATING

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Seat cushions (including backrests, if fitted) and seat frames are not fitted, not secure, are structurally damaged, have sharp or jagged edges, or protrusions.
    • Any reduction or increase in seating capacity must be certified by an Approved Person (Code LK7).



     

    LIGHT AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENT INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Lights and Electrical Components for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    LIGHTS AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS

    Objective:     To ensure that all lights, reflectors and other electrical lighting components as required by prescribed standards are operational.


    LIGHTING EQUIPMENT (See Note 4)

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Lights and reflectors fitted to a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), are not operational and not located in positions as required by prescribed standards.

    HEADLIGHT/S

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Are not correctly focused.
    • Lenses are not secure and not free of cracks or holes that would permit the entry of dirt or moisture.
    • Reflector surfaces are not free of tarnish or other damage which could reduce the intensity of high or low beam. (See Note 1)
    • Are not clearly visible under all normal conditions and of a consistent intensity, or are affected by dirty lenses or poor electrical contact.
    • A dipping device to change the headlights from the high beam position to the low beam position and operated from the normal driving position is not fitted and operational. (See Note 2)
    • A device to indicate to the driver that the headlights are in the high beam position is not fitted and operational. (See Note 2)

    OTHER LIGHTS AND REFLECTORS (See Note 4)

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Are not clearly visible under all normal conditions and of a consistent intensity, and are affected by dirty lenses or poor electrical contact.
    • Lenses and light reflectors are not securely mounted, are faded or discoloured and are not free from cracks, holes, or other damage which would allow the entry of moisture or dirt to impair the efficiency of the light or reflector.
    • The following lights do not operate correctly and are not fitted with appropriate lenses:
      .. front park lights;
      .. brake lights
      .. tail lights;
      .. turn signal indicator lights;
      .. number plate light;
      .. reversing lights (if fitted);
      .. additional lights (if fitted). (See Note 2)
    • The number plate light/s direct light onto surfaces other than the rear number plate.
    • The turn signal switch is not readily operable by the driver from the driving position.
    • The turn signal operation is not indicated by means of a visible and/or audible telltale.

    ADDITIONAL LIGHTING

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Additional lighting (fitted as accessories) is fitted in such a way that their operation will impair the operation of statutory lighting, and contravene prescribed standards.

    ADDITIONAL HEADLIGHTS (Driving Light/s)

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Additional driving lights do not operate in conjunction with the high beam circuit, and are not fitted with an independent on/off switch.

    WIRING HARNESS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Electrical wiring is not securely mounted and insulated, is exposed to excessive heat or chafing or located in such a way that would cause danger to the operation of the motorcycle.
    • Electrical wiring hinders driver or passenger movement.

    BATTERY

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • A battery is not secured in a cradle or carrier using hold down clamps and is cracked, leaking or has missing caps.

    WARNING DEVICE (Horn)

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • A warning device is not fitted and operational and the tone is not of a single pitch. (See Note 3)
    • A warning device is not clearly audible and the actuating mechanism is not located within the reach of the driver in the normal seated position.

    NOTES:

    [1] Fitted clear headlight covers are acceptable provided the intensity of high or low beam is not affected.

    Tinted headlight covers are acceptable but must be removed when high or low beam headlights are operated.

    Lens repairs are acceptable but must not reduce the effectiveness of the light when the light is lit.

    [2] White coloured lights or reflectors are only permitted for front facing lights, number plate and reversing lights. Amber lights are only permitted for indicators on motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s).

    Flashing lights are not permitted on a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), except as indicators and for use on special use vehicles i.e. vehicles fitted or built for use in hazardous situations on a road or emergency vehicles.

    Turn signal indicator lights must be fitted to all motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), manufactured on or after 1 July 1975.

    A motor vehicle built after 1934 that can travel at over 60 km/h must be fitted with a dual beam headlight system.

    A motor vehicle built after 1953 must be fitted with a device to indicate to the driver that the headlights are in the high beam position.

    [3] Dual air or electrical horns are acceptable but must be of a single note.

    [4] Further information on location and colour of lights is contained in AIS Information Sheet 8 - Motor Vehicle Lighting and the brochure "All About Modifications to Motor Vehicles".



     

    BODY AND CHASSIS INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below are a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to Body and Chassis for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    BODY AND CHASSIS

    Objective:     To ensure the vehicle body is free of protrusions, structurally sound and free from any defects or additional fittings that are likely to increase the risk of bodily injury to any occupant and other road users.


    HATCHES, HINGES AND CATCHES

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • All hatches, catches, removable covers and fastenings fitted to a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), and also including a side-car (if fitted), are not securely fitted, mounted and do not operate in the manner for which they were designed.


    BODY AND CHASSIS FRAME

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The body or chassis frame are cracked, broken, distorted or corroded to the point where a component is weakened or failure of a component is likely to occur.
    • Any fastenings between frame members, including welds, are not secured or are cracked or distorted.
    • Any repairs carried out do not retain the original strength of the component/section.


    BODY FITTINGS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Fairings and any attachments are not free of protrusions or fittings likely to cause injury to any person with whom the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), may come into contact. (See Note 3)
    • Motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), are not fitted with adequate protection (for rider and passenger) from any moving part (i.e. chain, road wheels, tyres, exhaust) or any area which would constitute a safety hazard and are not of the same curvature.
    • A side-car (if fitted), is not securely attached and mounted to the left hand side of the motorcycle.
    • Any part of a motorcycle (without a side-car), including motor tricycle(s), projects more than 150 mm ahead of the front wheel or 300 mm behind the rear wheel.


    MUDGUARDS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The wheels of a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), are not fitted with mudguards of a width not less than the maximum width of the tyre.
    • The front mudguard does not shield that portion of the wheel extending rearward from a point vertically above and horizontally behind the centre of the front wheel. (See Note 1)
    • The rear wheel(s) or side-car wheel mudguard does not shield that portion of the wheel between points vertically above the foremost and rearmost parts of the wheel.


    MOTORCYCLE (including Motor Tricycle) RIDING CONTROLS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Riding controls are not securely fastened and not in the correct location as per the relevant ADR for date of manufacture.
    • The correct number of footrests as per the seating capacity of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), are not fitted in a manner applicable to the frame manufacturer's technique.


    REAR VISION MIRRORS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Rear vision mirrors are not fitted in accordance with prescribed standards. (See Note 2)
    • Rear vision mirror(s) fitted to any motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), do not provide a clear view of the road to the rear of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), when the rider is in a natural riding position, and are not of the same curvature.
    • Mirror(s) are not securely mounted and free from damage, blemishes or tarnishing which would reduce the view to the rear of the vehicle.
    • If convex mirrors are fitted, the mirrors do not have a radius of curvature of not less than 1.2 metres.

    NOTES:

    [1] If the frame or body of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), provides adequate protection in any part of this area, then only the unprotected part of the region requires mudguard protection

    [2] At least 1 rear vision mirror must be fitted to a motorcycle or motor trike with 1 front wheel built before July 1975.

    At least 1 rear vision mirror must be fitted to each side of a motorcycle or motor trike with 1 front wheel built after June 1975.



     

    TOW COUPLING INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Tow Couplings for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    TOW COUPLINGS

    Objective:     To ensure that all tow couplings and associated components are in a serviceable condition and that they provide the necessary load carrying capacity.


    TOW COUPLINGS, WIRING HARNESSES, HOSES AND SAFETY CHAINS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Tow bars, tow coupling componentry and their attachments, if fitted to a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), are not operational, not secure, or are cracked, excessively worn, deformed or damaged in a way likely to cause failure.
    • All electrical wiring, connectors, etc. associated with a device for coupling a trailer to a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), are not securely mounted and operational.
    • Tow coupling tongue assemblies are repaired by heating or welding.
    • Tow coupling tongue assemblies are not securely mounted to the tow bar assembly.
    • The tow ball (if fitted) is not secure, is cracked or is excessively worn.
    • The tow ball assembly (50 mm type) is not legibly and indelibly marked with the mark "50" in characters not less than 5 mm high.
    • Safety chain/s or cables are not able to be connected or affixed in such a way that the safety chains/ cables are not liable to accidental disconnection and are not readily detachable from the towing vehicle.
    • A trailer coupling affixed to a motorcycle does not allow for angular movement of the combination about the vertical or horizontal axis.

    TOWING CAPACITY

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The tow coupling capacity does not equal or exceed the Aggregate Trailer Mass (ATM) of any trailer being towed (if applicable).

    NOTES:

    [1] Aggregate Trailer Mass (ATM) is the total mass of the laden trailer when carrying the maximum load recommended by the manufacturer. This includes any mass imposed onto the drawing vehicle when the combination vehicle is resting on a horizontal supporting plane.

    At least 1 rear vision mirror must be fitted to each side of a motorcycle or motortrike with 1 front wheel built after June 1975.



     

    STEERING AND SUSPENSION INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Steering and Suspension for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    STEERING AND SUSPENSION

    Objective:     To ensure that the steering and suspension is in good working order and allows the driver effective control of the vehicle.


    STEERING COMPONENTS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • All steering components are not in good condition, securely mounted and free from damage or distortion. (See Note 1)
    • Steering components are removed, heated, welded (modified) or bent without approval from Queensland Transport. (See Note 2)

    STEERING MECHANISM / DESIGN

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The handlebar of a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), is not secure and free play in the steering head exceeds manufacturer's specifications.
    • Where steering linkages are fitted, any rotational free play exceeds 10 mm at the end of the handlebar.
    • Steering gear and steering gear connections are not so designed so as to eliminate accidental detachment or overlocking.
    • Steering components are misaligned with the frame and not free from damage, fatigue, corrosion or distortion.
    • Repairs carried out to fork assemblies and handle bar assemblies indicate heating or welding.
    • Operation of the handlebar is not smooth from lock to lock and equipment fitted to the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), prevents free movement (e.g. the handlebar must not come into contact with the fuel tank).
    • Nuts, bolts or other fasteners used on steering components are not secure.
    • The handlebar assembly is not constructed of suitable material, adequately mounted and free of sharp edges and protrusions.
    • The handlebar is not symmetrical on either side of the front wheel and steering head assembly.
    • The handlebar is not of the same shape and length on both sides of the front wheel and steering head assembly.
    • If the forks are raked (i.e. modified wheelbase), the horizontal distance between the mid-point of the steering yoke bearings and a point vertically above the centre of the front wheel exceeds 550 mm.
    • Motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), fitted with offset triple clamps have a trail measurement of less than 75 mm. (See Note 3)
    • Handlebar grips are not secure and excessively damaged or unduly worn. (See Note 4)

    HANDLEBAR DIMENSIONS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The distance between the extreme ends of the handlebar assembly is greater than 900 mm and less than 500 mm.
    • The height of the lowest part of the handgrip is higher than 380 mm above the attachment point of the handlebar to the motorcycle.

    SUSPENSION SYSTEM

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Suspension components are not securely mounted and aligned with no distortion, cracks, corrosion, fractures or other damage likely to cause failure.
    • Wheel bearings and swing arm bushes/bearings are excessively worn.
    • Link ends are not secured with fasteners suitably locked (e.g. split pins, lockwire, tabs or selflocking nuts).
    • Suspension components are missing, or repaired or modified by heating or welding unless specifically approved by Queensland Transport.
    • Suspension components are worn beyond manufacturer's specifications.

    WHEEL BEARINGS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Are incorrectly adjusted, rough, noisy, loose on stub axle, do not rotate freely or are leaking.
    • Movement between disc brake rotor/brake drum and backing plate exceeds manufacturer's specifications.

    SHOCK ABSORBERS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Shock absorbers are not fitted, not securely mounted and brackets and rubbers are missing, worn, or damaged.
    • Shock absorbers do not effectively dampen or show signs of leakage.
    • When forced against the suspension and released, the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), rebounds past its normal height more than once.

    NOTES:

    [1] Must be inspected through the full range of steering movement, steering stops must prevent wheels or tyres from fouling motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), frame or suspension components on full lock.

    [2] Steering components that are modified or repaired by heating or welding without approval from Queensland Transport are not acceptable.

    [3] If offset triple clamps are fitted to the front fork assembly (i.e. the clamps are machined such that the angle of the fork stanchions is at an angle to the steering head axis), then the trail measurement should be checked to ensure that the centre of the front axle is at least 75 mm behind the point where the steering head axis line intersects the ground.

    [4] Handlebar grips, knobs, levers and other devices which have deteriorated to an extent that they are hazardous are unacceptable.



     

    WHEEL AND TYRE INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Wheels and Tyres for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    WHEELS AND TYRES

    Objective:     To ensure that road wheels and tyres are of a suitable type and condition and that they provide the necessary load carrying capacity, speed rating and control of the vehicle.


    WHEELS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Wheels/rims are not of an approved type and construction.
    • Wheels/rims fitted to an axle or axle group of a motortrike are not of the same size unless otherwise specified by the motortrike manufacturer.
    • Wheels/rims are not secure or are cracked, corroded, bent, buckled or otherwise damaged.
    • Stud or bolt holes are expanded or elongated or wheel and retainer tapers do not match.
    • A spoked wheel does not have all spokes fitted or the spokes are loose, corroded, bent, broken or cracked.
    • Each tyre is not capable of supporting the machine when it is fully loaded.
    • Tyres or wheels rub or foul on any part of the motorcycle.

    WHEEL SECURING DEVICES

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Wheels/rims are not fitted with the correct number and type of securing devices.
    • Studs/nuts are not securely fitted, are damaged and not engaged for at least the same thread length as provided originally by the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), manufacturer.

    TYRES

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Tyres are not compatible with the rim to which they are fitted and not of a type suitable for normal road use.
    • All tyres are not of the same case construction. (See Note 1)
    • Tyre load ratings are less than the minimum ratings specified originally by the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), manufacturer.
    • The speed rating of all tyres is not of at least 120 km/h or the motorcycle's, including motor tricycle(s), top speed unless a lower rating has been specified by the manufacturer. (See Notes 2 and 3)
    • Tyres do not have a tread pattern at least 1.5 mm deep, other than at tread wear indicators, in a band that runs continuously across the tyre width that normally comes into contact with the road and around the whole circumference of the tyre.
    • Tyre tread, shoulder or side wall rubber are damaged.
    • Tyres have cuts, bulges, tread separation, exposed or damaged cords or other evidence of case failure.
    • Valve stems are cracked, damaged, perished or loose.
    • Regrooved or recut tyres fitted to a motorcycle are not clearly marked "suitable for regrooving".
    • Any tyre clearly marked "suitable for regrooving" is regrooved or recut beyond the maximum permissible groove depth or is regrooved or recut in such a way that the ply or cord is exposed or damaged.

    TYRE / WHEEL WIDTH

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The wheels and tyres project beyond the extreme width of the mudguards.
    • The wheels and tyres contact any part of the vehicle under any combination of steering and/or suspension movement.

    NOTES:

    [1]  Steel radials, textile radials or conventional crossply must not be mixed.

    [2]  A tyre fitted to a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), must, when first manufactured, have been rated by the tyre manufacturer as suitable for road use at the lower of:

    [a]  a speed of at least 120 km/h; and

     the vehicle's top speed.

    [3]  Tyres branded "Not Suitable for Highway Use" (NHU) are not to be rejected solely for this reason.



     

    BRAKING SYSTEM INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Braking System for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    BRAKING SYSTEM

    Objective:     To ensure that the brakes operate effectively and are correctly adjusted.


    GENERAL

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • All motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), do not have two independent braking systems or a single brake that acts directly on all wheels of the vehicle and is arranged so that effective braking remains on at least 1 wheel if any part of the system fails.

    BRAKING SYSTEM OPERATION

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The brake controls, when operated, do not cause the corresponding brake to operate.
    • All failure indicators, pressure/vacuum gauges and warning devices do not operate correctly.

    HAND / PARK BRAKE AND CONTROL LEVERS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Brake foot lever/s do not have an effective anti-slip surface.
    • Brake levers are bent, damaged, broken, restricted or misaligned (outside scope of manufacturer’s original design).
    • The levers and associated components are not secure, not correctly adjusted, bind or are worn so as to affect efficient operation.
    • Maximum braking pressure, at levers, is not achieved without progressive applications of the brake lever and is not at least 50% of the maximum lever travel.
    • The lever does not remain firm when light pressure is maintained in the applied direction.
    • There is an indication of air in the hydraulic system.
    • A brake lever does not have free travel in accordance with the motor cycle, including motor tricycle(s), manufacturer’s specifications.
    • The brake control levers of a motorcycle brake (including park brake control lever as applicable to side cars and motor tricycle(s), does not have a reserve of travel of at least one fifth of the maximum range of application.
    • When not in use, the brake lever, handle or pedal does not return to the fully released position.
    • The rider cannot operate the foot lever without lifting their foot from the footrest. (Does not apply to Historically Registered Vehicles)
    • Linkages are not complete and components are unduly worn.
    • The park brake control lever (as applicable to side cars and motor tricycle(s)), does not have a mechanical locking system to enable sustained operation.
    • Cables are frayed, damaged or restricted.
    • Rods and cables are repaired by welding or joining.
    • The hand/park brake (as applicable to side cars) is not able to hold the motorcycle for a period of 5 minutes, facing each way, on a gradient of not less than 30% (as per ADR 33/00).

    HYDRAULIC LINES

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Hydraulic lines are not securely mounted, not free from damage or corrosion or show evidence of leakage, cracking, chafing or deterioration. (See Note 1)

    HOSES

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Flexible hoses are cracked, chafed, deteriorated, show evidence of leakage and are not manufactured and marked to relevant Australian Standards (or equivalent). (See Note 2)

    CYLINDERS AND CALIPERS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Hydraulic components, master cylinders, wheel cylinders/calipers etc. are not secured in a manner as recommended by the manufacturer or are seized, restricted or show evidence of leakage.

    RESERVOIRS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Any reservoir is not filled to the manufacturer’s recommended minimum level and/or show evidence of leakage.

    MECHANICAL LINKAGES

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Mechanical linkages and cables are not in a serviceable condition, are incorrectly adjusted, and not free of binding or excessive wear.
    • Correct locking devices are not fitted, where applicable.
    • There is evidence of repair by welding or brazing.
    • Cables are frayed or have broken strands.

    DISCS, PADS, DRUMS AND LININGS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Linings are worn below wear indicators. If no indicators are provided, the thinnest part of the lining is worn below manufacturer’s specifications. (See Note 3)
    • Drums or disc rotors are worn or machined below manufacturer’s specifications. (See Note 4)
    • There are substantial cracks on friction surfaces, external cracks or mechanical damage.
    • Lining material is contaminated with oil, grease or brake fluid.

    NOTES:

    [1] Normal commercial copper tubing has been prohibited from use in brake systems because it is considered prone to cracking due to work hardening. However, there is a Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Recommended Practice called Tubing - Motor Vehicle Brake Tubing Hydraulic - SAE J1047 which is the accepted industry standard. Persons wishing to use copper tube for vehicle hydraulic brake lines, must first provide proof of compliance with SAE J1047or equivalent standard.

    [2] Made up hoses are not acceptable. Where brake hoses are replaced with aftermarket products, relevant standards approval marking is required. Motorcycles manufactured on or after 1 July, 1975, the brake hoses must be marked as per ADR 7/00. (Made up hoses are not acceptable unless specifically approved.) Braided hoses are acceptable provided they are approved and correctly marked. Refer AIS Information Sheet 7 - Braided Brake Hoses.

    [3] Where manufacturer's specifications are not provided, the minimum thickness for bonded linings is 0.8 mm or 0.8 mm above the head of a rivet. Refer to AIS Information Sheet 16 - Machining and reconditioning of brake drums and discs.

    [4] Where manufacturer's specifications are not provided for drums, scoring must not be more than 1.5 mm for motorcycles.



     

    ENGINE, DRIVETRAIN AND EMISSION INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to the Engine, Drivetrain and Emissions for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    ENGINE / DRIVETRAIN / EMISSIONS

    Objective:     To ensure the engine, drivetrain and associated components provide a controlled transmission of power to the driving wheels.


    CLUTCH OPERATION

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Clutch components are not operational, are incorrectly adjusted or are cracked, bent or broken.
    • There is leakage of hydraulic fluid from the system.
    • Hydraulic components show indications of chaffing or rubbing on any part of the motorcycle.
    • Adjustment free play is not as per manufacturer’s specifications and exceeds one-fifth of the lever operation distance.

    GEARBOX OPERATION

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Any gear selected disengages whilst the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), is in motion.
    • The gear selector linkage is worn so as to affect the safe use of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), on a road.
    • The gearlever is not in the original position (inverted or reversed) as fitted by the manufacturer. (See Note 1)
    • Motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), with an automatic clutch system do not have a smooth transition.
    • Motorcycles (all types), and including motor tricycle(s), with an unladed mass of 0.45 tonne or greater do not have a reverse gear fitted.

    ENGINE / TRANSMISSION MOUNTINGS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The engine is not securely mounted to the frame of a motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s).
    • Mounting brackets and mounts are not securely fastened and not free of cracks or distortion.
    • Rubber components are perished, broken or deteriorated.

    LEAKS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • An engine, transmission, differential and associated piping leaks oil on to the roadway or on to any exhaust system or brake component. (See Note 2)

    ENGINE

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • An engine and associated emission components manufactured to comply with the requirements of the relevant Australian Design Rules, are altered or modified so that they no longer comply with those Rules.

    REPLACEMENT ENGINE

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • A replacement engine, other than one offered as an option by the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), manufacturer for that make and model, is not approved by Queensland Transport (endorsed approval letter).

    ENGINE CONTROLS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Engine controls as fitted by the manufacturer do not operate in a smooth and efficient manner.
    • Engine speed does not return to normal idle position upon release of the accelerator pedal or throttle control. (See Note 3)

    DIFFERENTIAL

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • The differential (if fitted) is excessively worn so as to affect the safe use of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), on a road.

    DRIVE LINE COMPONENTS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • A chain/belt is not free of excessive wear (within manufacturer’s specifications).
    • Drive sprockets are not free from excessive wear and incorrectly adjusted.
    • Motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), are not fitted with a chain or drive shaft guard.
    • The chain or drive shaft guard is not in good condition, is incorrectly fitted and not of correct dimensions so as to provide a safe operating environment for the operator. (See Note 4)

    FUEL SYSTEM

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Replacement carburetors fitted to any motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), do not continue to comply with the emission requirements of the Australian Design Rules applicable at the time of the motorcycle's manufacture.
    • Air cleaners are not fitted. (See Note 5)
    • After market turbocharger or supercharger assemblies are fitted to motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), without specific approval from Queensland Transport.
    • Nitrous oxide injection equipment is fitted irrespective of its operational ability.
    • Motor cycles, including motor tricycle(s), designed to operate on unleaded fuel are not fitted with a smaller filler neck which will only accept the nozzle of an unleaded petrol pump.
    • Fuel system components are not securely mounted and free of leaks.
    • The fuel tank is affected by rust or corrosion.
    • A fuel tank cap that complies with manufacturer's specifications is not fitted.

    EXHAUST CONSTRUCTION

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Exhaust extractors or headers fitted to any motorcycle:
      .. foul any part of the suspension, brake or fuel system;
      .. do not have fittings (if applicable) for emission control equipment and do not retain exhaust pipes and mufflers incorporated in the exhaust system to ensure the vehicle maintains compliance with Australian Design Rules for vehicle emissions.
    • Any alteration or modification to the exhaust system is not to a standard provided originally by the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), manufacturer.
    • An exhaust system component fitted external to the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), is not protected by suitable guarding.
    • Exhaust gases do not discharge to the rear of the rearmost seating position of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s).
    • All exhaust system components are not securely mounted with adequate clearance between other parts of the motorcycle, including motor tricycle(s), and the road.

    EMISSIONS

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • There are leaks or excessive noise from the exhaust system and joints during operation.
    • When operating, an engine of a motor vehicle emits visible emissions for a period of 10 seconds or more. (See Note 6)

    EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM

    Possible reasons for inspection rejection:
    • Motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), manufactured with emission devices do not have all emission control equipment properly located, connected and not damaged, deteriorated or altered in any way to reduce effectiveness.

    NOTES:

    [1] The only acceptable conversion is to fit a linkage which keeps the gear change pattern the same as the original.

    [2] Motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), manufactured with total loss lubricating systems which have been designed to "leak" are excluded from this condition.

    [3] For Vintage and Veteran motorcycles, including motor tricycle(s), manufactured without self-releasing throttle, the throttle does not operate in the manner prescribed by the manufacturer.

    [4] The guard must provide protection for at least the upper free run of the drive chain.

    [5] If applicable, owner to supply documented confirmation that air cleaners were not fitted as original equipment.

    [6] This does not apply to emissions that are visible only because of heat or the condensation of water vapour.



     

    ROAD TEST INSPECTION GUIDELINES

    Vehicle inspection is subjective and the guidelines open to varying interpretation from inspector to inspector. Below is a list of reasons for possible rejection pertaining to Road Testing for the issuing of a Queensland Transport safety certificate (formerly roadworthy certificate or RWC).


    ROAD TEST

    Objective:     To confirm the safe operation of the motorcycle.


    ROAD TEST

    A road test is to be conducted unless a defect has been detected during the initial visual checks, which, in the opinion of the examiner, would make the motorcycle unsafe to operate on the road.

    The standards to be applied during the road test are contained in the relevant component sections of the Queensland Transport Code of Practice for Approved Inspection Stations (AIS) and Approved Persons.

    The operation of the following must be validated during the road test:
    • hand brake;
    • foot brake;
    • parking brake (if applicable);
    • steering;
    • clutch;
    • suspension;
    • gear change mechanism;
    • throttle control;
    • drivetrain condition;
    • riding position/visibility;
    • exhaust system;
    • speedometer and odometer operation;
    • engine does not stall at idle.

    Note: If a defect is detected during a road test the examiner must record fail on the Inspection Report; i.e.
    • The road test section; and
    • The applicable component section (i.e. brakes, steering, etc.)

    SERVICE BRAKE TEST

    Possible reasons for rejection at inspection:
    • The motorcycle pulls to the left or right or has a grabbing affect when the brakes are applied.
    • Braking is not even or does not function correctly on all wheels.
    • For a motorcycle built after 1930, the service brake is not capable of stopping the motorcycle within a distance of 12.5 metres during a brake test from a speed of 35 km/h with the motorcycle and combination in neutral.

    PARKING BRAKE (if applicable)

    Possible reasons for rejection at inspection:
    • For a motorcycles built after 1930, the parking brake of a motorcycles or combination must be able to hold the motorcycle or combination stationary on a 12% gradient.

    SPEEDOMETER / ODOMETER

    Possible reasons for rejection at inspection:
    • Motorcycles which were fitted with a speedometer at the time of original manufacture are not fitted with an operational speedometer readily visible to the driver.
    • Motorcycles are not fitted with an operational odometer readily visible to the driver.


     

    If you require further information about safety certificate inspections or inspection guidelines phone


     

    Brian Harper
    at
    Motorcycle Roadworthys
    on
    0402 544 115


     

  • philthy
    philthy
    14 years ago

    Thanks fellas, I'll give the motor reg another go. Maybe the cranky shit I spoke to there before, is retired, or dead,either way good.  I bought the 69 in LA through Carls Speed Shop in 1986. It still had yank rego on it and I rode it all round NSW with a current yank plate and rego. Never got pulled up once! Then the rego ran out and I later shifted to Qld in '89. Swapped plates with my 84 Softail until the cops (which knew me) said "Hey Philthy, why don't ya put wingnuts on yer number plates?" the Detective said.  Hmmmm...  long story short, they were gunna book me if they saw the softy number plate and rego label on the 69. I got a stern warning. From a detective to!!!  What a classic though,wingnuts.  I'm the second owner of her and she is still all original everything. The motor has never been split. She has a centre stand,original tool kit,owners manual,receipt of purchase when bought new, pink slip (rego papers), chainguard, and other shit ... Yeah,My Dresser. Luv the 'ol girl. Needs a polish and a battery at present, otherwise going good..  Still got the Tillotson carb to, which I got from HD Development a few yrs ago. When I work out this photo bukt shit I'll do a nice story and pics about her. RT took and posted pics recently that were attached to the        '' Bike Show in Mackay" photo's if ya wanna perve at her.    

  • philthy
    philthy
    14 years ago

    Thanks Houli, fucknose why I couldn't find it.  I'll print it out and frame It!!!    

  • houli
    houli
    14 years ago

    Thats a beaut 69 you have, is the sportster buddy seat mounted on the pogo or solid, it looks like it sits lower than the original buddy, need more pics of that classic and maybe  Hogbagger will stick up some pics of his 62.

  • houli
    houli
    14 years ago

    Good luck with getting the knucklehead,   hope to see some pics of that one on the road unrestored.

  • houli
    houli
    14 years ago

    This is the stock buddy seat fitted to a 70FLH the same seat was offered on 69 models, you can see the pogo and the helper springs, a lot of people fitted the sporster buddy seat as it was a thinner profile and you never sat half way up the tank, as nice and pretty as this is i prefer an original ridden bike with all its fading and oil stained parts.

Topics