Soldiers to be charged over raid....

2/2
  • andij
    andij
    14 years ago
    if you dont support our troops in war you dont deserve to be australian ,the top brass are spineless and noticed no support from any pollies .the aussies are restricted on the rules of engagement as it is but when your shot at ,its at least self defence should be sufficent
  • Isaac
    Isaac
    14 years ago

    Given the sheer number of 'contacts/engagements' in which our Troops are involved I doubt there's a fire fight that couldn't be handled better or differently with the benefit of hindsight.

    Our Diggers are well versed in the 'rules of engagement' and would adhere to those rules as best they can. But this is war and when rounds are exchanged people are gonna get hurt.

    In fact our blokes would need x-ray vision to know what was on the other side of that mud wall!

    To pick over the minutae of every moment of this incident is an insult to the intelligence of us all; they got shot at and they responded! That's what Soldiers do!

    Football analogy: For all the planning & training & tactical detail a Coach & Team put into their game plan, history shows it doesn't actually work out that way on the day. Mistakes are made and SHIT HAPPENS!!

    Our blokes did their best to play by the rules but the opposing mob don't play by the same rules; I hope the 'investigating body' keep this in mind as they pore over the reports - whilst seated safe & sound in an air conditioned boardroom somewhere! 

  • boxa
    boxa
    14 years ago
    Thing is everyone on here has got a computer , HOW MANY have e-mailed there local mp and told them what they think

    DO IT the pen is mightier than you think
  • Deadwood
    Deadwood
    13 years ago

    FYI

    www.heraldsun.com.au/news/defence-drops-last-of-afghan-raid-charges/story-e6frf7jo-1226125686727

    Defence drops last of Afghan raid charges

    UPDATE 5.25pm: LEGAL action has finally ended against a group of Australian commandos involved in a disastrous raid in which six Afghan civilians died.

    The Director of Military Prosecutions yesterday applied formally to withdraw the last of the charges against a regular army officer.

    The Judge Advocate ordered a charge of failing to comply with a general order and in the alternative, prejudicial conduct, be dropped.

    Manslaughter charges against two commando reserve soldiers, a sergeant and a lance corporal, were withdrawn at a pre-trial hearing in May.

    Defence said all legal processes relating to charges over the incident had now been concluded.

    The charges stemmed from a raid conducted by members of the Special Operations Task Group (SOTG) in Afghanistan on February 12, 2009.

    SOTG soldiers came under fire as they conducted a compound clearance operation, responding with gunfire and hand grenades. Six civilians, including five children, were killed as a result of the operation.

    Defence force chief General David Hurley said Defence was committed to proper processes to ensure those charged received a fair trial and the integrity of the military legal process was preserved.

    "The legal processes that were adhered to in relation to this matter were independent of the chain of command," he said.

    Defence Minister Stephen Smith said he would now ask the director of Military Prosecutions Brigadier Lyn McDade to provide a comprehensive assessment of the case and of circumstances which led to it being finalised.

    Mr Smith said these were the first charges for manslaughter in the theatre of war for a very long time.

    "It is important, given the opportunity, just to run the ruler over the system, given this is the first time we have experienced such matters in living memory,'' he told ABC television.

    "It would of course would be entirely inappropriate to do such a thing in the midst, or in the course, of such proceedings.''

    Mr Smith said he would make a judgement on whether that assessment could be publicly released, taking advice from General Hurley and Defence Department secretary Duncan Lewis.

2/2