lookin at a new beastie very soon can"t decide wide glide or fatbob ?.
which is the better ?.
fatbob
rode the fatbob and loved it
now in two minds fat bob, wide glide chopper look and still to try the fat boy low big fat and tough man its hard
like a kid in a candy store
only two months away and new bike
fundi
I had the same dilemma, for me in the end it came down to riding style, (I tend to get a little enthusiastic through the twisties ) so i decided on the Fat Bob.
I loved the look of the wideglide front end, same as some of the others who replied, I love that old school chopper look. The Bob on the other hand has the bob tail fender which I prefer, but I wasn't all that keen on the twin headlight. When I had a closer look at the specs, the Bob came out a winner for handling with twin disc from end and better ground clearance. Now in saying that I hadn't written off the wideglide yet as I previously oven a softail standard which handled fine and had similar spec. Next came the test rides which was the deciding factor for me.
The Fat bob handling won me over in the end, the one thing that i didn't like about the wideglide (which i only picked up after i rode it) was the way they have now raked the front end, it's no longer done in the frame, they are now raking them through the triple trees. This does change the dynamics of the steering, which was quite noticeable to me, Not saying it a bad thing, just gives it a different dynamic/feel when riding.
BTW the twin headlights have grown on me now
my advice is the same as most have already given, take them for a ride before you decide.
Personally, Fat Bob. Read a lot of reviews, quite a few mentioned that they felt the Bob was one of the best Harleys they had produced so far. I really like the twin discs on the front for that extra stopping power as some have told me the single discs are not quite as responsive when braking.
Personally I couldn't say for sure as I only test rode the Fat Bob. Feels really stable. I hear some people saying they don't like the factory tyres on the back, but have not bothered me.
But, as everyone else is saying....take 'em both for a test ride and make a choice......otherwise flip a coin
All of the above points are valid. I make a living on performance suspension, wheels, rotors, & handling using Harleys. I have had a 2005 Dyna Low Rider since new. I never road it because of its many short comings in comfort and handling, I use it for a shop parts mule. Things to consider if purchasing a new Dyna:
1. Raked trees reduce the trail but at the same time make the steering feels really weird IMO. The wheel does not follow the same plane as the steering stem. Some think this looks good and that is the reason why one would do it.
2. The 49 mm fork tubes are 2” longer (aprox) than the other models. I use this option when building a fork using a 17” front wheel and a low profile sticky racing tire. You can switch out the triple trees from Wide Glide to Fat Bob for a 0* steering stem offset.
3. For experienced riders who require handling the 19” wheel found on most Dynas must go as they are one of the worst handling tires Harley ever made excluding a 21” which takes first place. I am changing my 19” as soon as I can find a suitable 17” X 3.5” dual disk hub that is light weight. I will use the wide glide option and keep the 30 mm Ohlins cartridges.
4. Fat Bob has a wide and high side walled 16” front wheel with dual twin cam calipers/rotors and the Wideglide has a 21” wheel with single disk.
Rotor/brake upgrades are very limited with the 2006 Dyna line with the raised caliper mounts to fit the larger 300 mm rotors in place of raising the caliper in the mounting like the Brembo/Dresser & VRod.
19" Front:
My FXR 17" wheel with a large 140 mm for long distance riding with 13" rotor. The difference in handling between the 17" V/S the 19" is like night & day.
I own a 2010 Wide Glide and the front brake is pretty 'average'. So, this week I had a diamond-black braided brake line fitted to the front brake. Now I have a great front brake.